pf » The client variables debacle
The client variables debacle
Nathan Strutz recently said that client variables are no good to use. From reading his entire post, he isn't saying that the concept is flawed, just the current implementation. He even suggests how they may could be improved. I blogged about the overhead caused by client variables back in 2003, the problem was that even if you check disable global client variable updates ColdFusion was still hitting the DB server on every page request. This was in ColdFusion 6.1, I haven't retested for 7.0 yet.
Nathan also points out that All options are server-wide, it would be cool to have different options for each application. Don't forget that there are some options for client variables in the cfapplication tag such as the clientmanagement attribute that lets you turn it on and off, clientstorage attribute lets you specify which datasource to use (must be enabled for client storage in admin first), or registry, or cookie, and setclientcookies can be enabled or disabled on an application basis. See the docs for the cfapplication tag. So you can create a database for each application to use, then for each db you can set the purge time, and disable global client variable updates. Am I missing something here?
Nathan also suggests that we need more options for client storage, how about using files or a proprietary client variable server (aka state server). I agree more options are better, but I'm curious to know what advantages a proprietary client variable server would have, why not just fix how CF uses a database server?
If your going to use them, decouple them
I applaud Nathan for bringing this up again, he raises some good points. While I wouldn't go as far to say we should never use them, I would be take care as to how you use them, and I highly recommend de-coupling them from your application logic. So create a CFC that uses client variables inside to manage state, and if you want to change to session, or your own db implementation you can change how it all works without effecting your entire code base.
Related Entries
- Client Variables unnecessary overhead? - December 4, 2003
- CFSCRIPT Cheatsheet - May 5, 2008
- ColdFusion 8 Update 1 Fixes some Image Processing Quirks - April 5, 2008
- 10 Most Useful Image Functions in ColdFusion 8 - April 5, 2008
- ColdFusion 8 Image Manipulation Presentation Recording - October 26, 2007
ColdFusion 6.1 has a client variable hotfix rollup which actually contains several fixes including the one for hitting the database even if "Disable Global Updates" switch was checked.
From the technote at http://www.macromedia.com/go/tn_19590 the following bug fix is documented: "59915 - Client variables were incorrectly updated even when they were not changed, and Disable global client variable updates was checked in the ColdFusion Administrator"
These fixes are also in CFMX 7 by default.
Nathan - the per variable settings would be cool, but could perhaps create more overhead and performance issues?
Basically the idea would be, if you normally refer to a variable as session.userid, instead create a cfc with a method getUserID(), then cfreturn session.userid.
This allows you to change this to client, cookie, etc at another time.
http://www.lynchconsulting.com.au/blog/index.cfm/2007/5/1/MemCached-Client-for-CFMX--alpha-version
Cheers, Mark
- CFSCRIPT Cheatsheet
- 3 New Image Effects for ColdFusion 8
- Googlebot to Submit Web Forms
- ColdFusion 8 Update 1 Fixes some Image Processing Quirks
- 10 Most Useful Image Functions in ColdFusion 8
- Speaking at NYC CFUG This Week
- Adobe AIR Tutorial for HTML / JavaScript Developers
- INFORMATION_SCHEMA Support in MySQL, PostgreSQL
RSS
add to del.icio.us
Pete Freitag is a software engineer, and web developer located in










