pf » Expose for Windows
Expose for Windows
Exposé is definitely my favorite feature in OSX, and just the other day, I found a
Windows version of Exposé called iEx.
iEx does the job, but it can be a bit flaky. For instance if you hold down F9 you computer will sketch out, and sometimes you need to force the window to redraw after you select it by moving or resizing it. If you have too many windows open sometimes they don't all fit on the screen (I'm not sure how Apple handles this). It is also not nearly as fast as Apple's Exposé. I'm running iEx on a 2Ghz P4, and it takes about 1-2 seconds for the thumbnails to show up, and on a slow Mac they will show up pretty much instantaneously
I found this on Jason Shellen's blog where he mentions two other programs that mimic Exposé:
Knock-offs of the Expose feature of OSX are plentiful. I purchased WinPlosion (formerly WinExpose) Price: $9.95. WinPlosion is a bit slow and not really worth the money. Here are a few others that mimic this feature on Windows as well: iEx Price: Free. Windows Exposer Price: $7.
- Expose for Windows JavaPenguin
It can do a few things that the other clones don't do well, like Live Previews and complete customization, and it also has a new Alt+Tab window which shows small previews that can be enabled if you want it.
Unlike the others, WinPLOSION runs smooth and fast (had no crashes so far, however, testing since 2 days only..) and it seems to be the best Exposé-clone available for the Windows plattform at this moment.
Give it a try, I am sure you will love it?
And don't you think that paying 10 bucks is really not much money? I also had a question and the support of Winplosion answered within 1 day.
I am just sick of you nerds who just expect to be everything for free... WinPlosion works just perfectly for me, there are no bugs, no crashes, performance is great, and I feel like having no problems with it paying 10 dollar for this software.
I have no problem paying for software that works, but I did have problems with WinPlosion on a dual headed machine. It would hijack my cursor on one of the monitors. They may have fixed this by now, but right now I'm not running either of these programs.
The software is also quite buggy, Function keys dont work somehow.
So: If you want a stable running, fast and nice Exposé-clone for your Windows-machine, use WinPlosion.
Dave
Cheers, Tracy
I just downloaded it now and I must say it is pretty crappy, it is slow and the animation is not smooth. Also it needs .Net..! How about making software which doesn't need the .Net framework? And finally it will not work on my Windows2000, only on XP. WinPLOSION runs smooth on both my crappy old notebook running Windows98 and even smoother on my Dell Dimension 8000 running Windows2000...
Cheers, Mira
Mira
Mira
waaah, I have no idea
Cheers, Mira
WinPLOSION is definitely not junk, it is by far the best Exposé-clone available for the MS Windows plattform, it offers great performance and smooth animations.
Try for your self: www.winplosion.com
Cheers, Mira
I personally use WinPLOSION and I am fully happy with it, it is really fast and the animation is smooth.
Regards, Paul
Regards, Paul
Britte
Britte
I have tried WinPlosion and can testify that well, I'm sorry, but it kind of sucks. The seam between it and your desktop is too obvious. In other words, it's obvious you are running another program, because of a flash or whatever.
I can't remember the details exactly (after having tried another version for linux) but I do remember that it's not worth using.
I just can repeat that WinPLOSION (and yes, this is how the product is spelled), is just great, it is by far better than Entbloess and every other Exposé-clone for Windows. Check it out for yourself here: http://www.winplosion.com/
Cheers, Britte
The reason I use entbloess over winplosion is because it is more customizable. It runs smoother on my machine and quicker. Winplosion had me waiting for almost 5 seconds the first time I hit alt+1. HOWEVER, if I had to say one was smoother (by the time everything got loaded into memory) I would say Winplosion is smoother, but not by a great amount.
Entbloess is also more customizable. I also enjoy how it puts the title of document/program when you mouseover the window. It's live preview is only a joke with movie files. I've noticed that it live previews only on a mouseover with VLC.
It's easy enough to say one piece of software is "better" than another, but in this case they're nearly identical. Try both and just decide for yourself. Another thing to consider (and I am saddened by this) is that entbloess is becoming discontinued. Oh well, I like how it is, but it could be 'better'.
-- Slunk
However, they all have their flaws, some more than others:
TopDesk: great app in its F9/tile feature. Works well and swiftly with window captions but in the Trial version theres no F10/F11 equivalent or configuration options! Only in the registered version. Well, what use is that to me? I want to test the full app not some crippled version. Add to that, the fact that it was using 31MB of system ram and it loses the battle. The resitered version has lots more options apparently but with the other competition here, im not paying the $10 to find out.
iEx: The good thing about this is that its free and despite what people say, is very easy to install. So you dont get a shortcut in your start menu, well boo-hoo. Easily fixed. However, thats about all the good things I have to say. Its exceptionally buggy and simply does not work properly. End of story. Screen redraw, screwing up my desktop.
Winglance: I liked this, and it had the lowest memory footprint of the useable ones, of less than 4MB ram. Unfortunately the F10/F11 equivalent features arent there, and I require those features. It does preview minimised windows though including ones in the tasktray, and also an exclusion list. Its a shame because it was reliable and quick with a low memory footprint. Price? $9.
WinExposer: Well, it looks like the criticism of this product is justified, which cannot be said of the $7 price. Charging for this buggy unfinished rubbish is ludicrous. At least iEx is free and so is relatively free of criticism. I already have the .net framework installed for lots of other apps but it still had a footprint of 18mb and was extremely slow (i have a P4-2.4ghz/512mb/radeon9600pro). Dont waste any time and money on this.
Entbloess: Wow. What can I say? It has flawless F9/F10/F11 implementation, with window captions. The F11 is smooth and there is no flicker. After disabling the ridiculous live previews and moving the preview quality from high to medium, it worked just as advertised and was very faithful to the apple implementation. I think the price is very reasonable at $7.99 too. The only downside I could see was that it uses a massive 23mb of ram.
Winplosion: This has similar functionality to Entbloess only not as well implemented. The F11 is flickery and the F10 sometimes has to be pressed a couple of times to get it going. Like Entbloess it gives windows a sense of proportion and doesnt give them all the same size, but the windows dont have any captions,the transparency and animations arent as smooth and the window positions arent logical. My winamp might be in the bottom left but on Expose its at top right. Not good. However, these things arent that important to me, such cosmetics and I think I'll be using this over Entbloess because it takes only 7mb of system ram and is a fraction faster (until I get some more ram!). Price? $10.
And no Im not a sycophant of any of these products, or the author either or on any commission.
After searching for some time for a good Exposé clone I've been quite happy with WinPLOSION. It's not perfect and it's a bit flakey if you try to show all windows just after opening one and such, but it's smooth and, as has been mentioned, isn't as resource-hungry as some of the others.
As to the Function key/keyboard shortcuts gripes, I can't comment on them. I just don't care about them, wouldn't use them, and don't want them -- I really have only wanted the Hot Corner abilities in my upper left and lower left corners. I also don't care much about the Live Updating of windows -- a static thumbnail is just fine thanks.
Sooo... WinPLOSION is probably the best place to start for anyone looking for an Exposé clone. None of the clones are perfect, but right now WinPLOSION seems to be the best bet. Hopefully they'll continue to improve it (v2.17 right now) and it'll make further strides in stability and working out some of the graphical flakiness. After that try Entbloess if for some reason WinPLOSION isn't meeting your needs...
-- Primis.
Look. A mac is a mac for a reason. Windows does NOT have Quartz or Core Image technology to pull of these tricks. After trying winplosion (which came closest), i like TopDesk best. Its smooth, and you're not missing too much w/o live previews. The things the trial CAN do, it does well..so you know the full version should do all that you require.
I don't even know the web address, so you know i'm not pluggin' anything.
Frankly, i'd say buy a damned mac mini and get your Expose fix over with.
Entbloess is like holy effin beautiful. It's eye candy central. Possibly a better implementation of expose than the original! Doesn't work with my dual head setup though, it freaks out with the 2nd monitor. If it ever gets fixed for dual head, I'll be all over it.
Note hardware capabilities aren't something I can really test. Neither taxed my machine at all, although the memory footprint was bigger with Entbloess.
And what surpised me... Wow! I can't belive all the "WinPLOSION" fans out there. Have you guys tried Entbloess 2? It blows WinPLOSION out of the water! In the ability of all the settings, the quality, the smoothness, speediness, everything. In some respects, it's BETTER then Expose! (Not the quality of the video, because nothing could ever come close, but the customizability of it.)
SO I did a PRO/CON test on both programs.
WinPLOSION:
Pros: - Ability to customize hot corner size - Ability to adjust animation - Ability to turn off animation - Ability to save or not save screenshots in memory - Ability to turn off or on minimized windows - Ability to exclude applications (in list form) - Ability to "take settings to default"
Cons: - Usually very slowly to react - Usually very buggy in the quality/speed/smoothness and flickered all the time! (as surfboy said, flickery) (some of the problems were fixed by "alternative capture method", whatever that is) - Desktop hot corner/key seamed to freak my display out, very flickery and slow! Especially if you hit it twice to get back to your windows. - Slightly lengthy startup (Longer then Entbloess 2) - NO title displayed (Heck Entbloess displays the title AND you can customize what the title looks like!) - It ate my system! As I was typing this with WinPLOSION, my text was actually being delayed, it was practically bringing my system to a halt, and my machine is fairly fast, but not screaming. (a Pentium4 2.8GHz with 512 PC-2700 DDR RAM and a ATI RAEDOM 9200 w/ 64mb of ram) - Windows do not highlight on mouse over (Expose does it, Entbloess does it, why not WinPLOSION?) - NO Ability to turn off hot key operation
Entbloess 2:
Pros - HUGE amount of customizable settings (almost unwieldy, could even be a CON in some eyes! Not simple enough to use or streamline?) - Ability to Disable/Enable program (to turn it off without closing the application) - Quick startup - Ability to clear resources - Dynamic help window (VERY helpful for first time users, especially with the amazing amount of settings) - AND ability to turn off the dynamic help window. - Ability to turn off/on system tray icon - Ability to turn off/on program start on windows startup - Ability to customize the "preview" options, gives you the ability to customize if it captures windows that it already has captured, capture all windows all the time, or none at all, or only ones that have changed size. This helps balance performance with functionality for all types of computer speeds. - Ability to update foreground window, or at intervals - Enable live previews or not (this DOES work, as Slunk noted, like my music player was moving along, but windows media player video did not display) - Ability to adjust quality of captures - Ability to turn off/on regions into account (ie: the locations of your windows) - Ability to change screen captures method, "print window" method, or screen whenever possible. - Change/Add background image, use desktop image, no image, OR background color - Adjust spacing - Ability to turn off animation, slide animation, fade animation, OR both slide/fade - Ability to change font of title, shadow, outline, font color, etc. - Ability to turn off/on hot keys and corners - Customize minimized windows in FOUR different options: show caption bar only (MY personal favorite, takes up less space, and u can still access them), restore all, restore all AND THEN minimize, OR don't show at all. HOW AWESOME!!! - 8 HOT spot locations! All corners AND in between corners. - Hotspot delay control (Instant -> Delayed) to help with accidental activation - Very smooth and and fast desktop hot key/corner NO FLICKER!
Misc Notes on Entbloess: SOMETIMES I was able to control the program once all windows were shown. Which I thought was REALLY neat!! For example, I could tab between fields in certain programs, or go to next track in iTunes, or arrow down in my messenger buddy list. However sometimes the tab and arrow keys would tab or arrow through highlighting the captured windows. Not sure if this is a pro or con because it seamed very inconsistent. I thought it was really neat to be able to control the programs inside their screen captures. However I could only do it sometimes, and when I could, I could not tab or arrow between windows, which ALSO was a nice feature. Hmm! Couldn't decide if it was a pro or con, because it was not consistent. Both features were nice. I just wish it would do both at the same time, and all the time.
Cons: The intermittent (problem?) thing above in "misc." I honestly could not find anything wrong with this! It's a great mimic of Expose. That said, one more con... It's not Expose!
I can't comment on the "function keys" much either, I use my hot corners.
Personally I don't use any of those programs, I am loving my Mac. Sorry guys...
Well, I personally do use WinPlosion and I like it. Already the first version of it worked fine for me, when v.2. was published I received a free upgrade, so, why should I change?
Best, Thomas
Winplosion *looks* very good, but it's very unreliable, and "show minimized windows" option never works.
Exposer looks good. Not as good as Winplosion, but it isn't as fast and doesn't show minimized windows.
Topdesk looks good, but it's S=L-O-W. I also don't like the fact that you cannot change most options in the trial version. Bad idea, guys.
Entbloess is excellent. Not perfect, but it's fast and reliable, unlike some of the other Expose clones. It works perfectly with minimized windows, and it has a ton of options to customize its behavior. The preview image quality is excellent, too. The only thing I can complain about is that it makes all preview windows except the one the cursor is hovering over transparent, and there is no option to change this. I would prefer that all preview windows be opaque. However, Entbloess is definitely the best I've tried. I'll report back after playing with it a bit more.
*sigh*
Well, it's back to waiting for Longhorn for me. Or maybe I'll bitch at the Winplosion devs. If they spent more time fixing their software and less time making shill posts, Winplosion might be worth buying.
Buy a Mac. Far better, and this feature is built in to the OS, and it works, no problems.
besides, who hasn't slid the cursor back and forth on the screen a million times when bored? ^_^
winplosion is nice, but it's not close enough to expose' for my tastes. i still haven't tested winexposer, but i don't want to waste a single one of my preview sessions in entbloess (i hate that name). btw, you get 100 uses in the demo. man. and it's 7.99 usd. so anyways, yeah, if yer stuck in windows, just use entblahblahblee.
although i agree with matt. buy a mac. quit using windows. you'll cry when you find out how much nicer the hardware and OS.
apple 0wnz j00.
no, i'm not gay ^_^
not implying that apple users are gay, but that people who say things like "0wnz j00" tend to be so.
peace.
oh and it will ALWAYS take a few seconds when loading new window previews. that's just life.
1.2ghz P4 512 meg of ram
video card may have something to do with my success with entbloobloo though. 256 meg of ram on it. forgot the clock speed. i think it's like 255 or something. too lazy to look it up. i think ram is, i dunno. i don't really care right now.
oh and i don't have many services running. lots of freed resources.
maybe you all just suck ;)
haha kidding.
anyways.
mac user's opinion over.
All that "this is better and smoother" speech... You should understand that the development team of a small application like a taskmanager replacement are very small. I guess 1-3 developer... That also means that they have a limited number of computer to test and optimize their software. Maybe the developer team of Entbloess uses systems with an AMD CPU and a nVidia graphics card... And the team of WinPLOSION uses Intel and ATI... Their applications are optimized... For their system, but maybe not for other configurations. One app runs smoother on one system, on another system it's the other one. It would really make sense, if you guys not always complain about performance and missing smoothness but just tell your personal experience AND your hardware configuration!
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/7/prweb260467.php
Just saw it on Yahoo-News.
Cheers, Lisa
grtz
Also if anyone, and I mean ANYONE, has tried any of these with a dual monitor setup and been successfull please let us know.
Cheers all, Ben.
P.S. The reason I don't have a mac is because I'm cheap 'n' poor and macs are great and expensive (may be looking into a mac mini soon, but they came out about a month after I bought my PC)
I totally agreed with you comments about ignoring certain posts. TopDesk, Entbloess, and Winplosion are all available as trial versions, so I'd suggest that if you're looking for this kind of utility then the best thing to do is try out all three to see which one suits you best.
I personally do use WinPlosion. Regardless what people say, it still is the one tool with the best performance and the best windows-placement-algorithm.
I'm here to answer any questions people have about TopDesk, or respond to any comments people make about TopDesks features. If someone asks a question about TopDesk or related to one of TopDesks features on a blog, I'll respond to it if I can help out (you can check out my comments in other blogs by searching for "topdesk" in any blog search engine).
I don't want to get involved in any tit-for-tat about which application is better, as I think its best for users to decide for themselves. If a user prefers another application to TopDesk, that's fine. If they want to tell others that they think another application is better than TopDesk, thats fine too. Each to their own, as they say :).
I disagree with the fact that griping and moaning is counterproductive tho. If you write software and sell/give it away you must be ready for constructive and non-constructive criticism, thats what makes to improve your product (if you're that way inclined).
As for the whole Mac/PC debate well thats been raging for years now and I choose to use Windows, not because its better but because there are plenty more games and software out there. If you're in to DTP and graphics then the mac is the thing for you.
The reason we want our Windoze software to look like Mac is because we like the look and feel, not the more limited choice of software and potentially hefty price tags for an equivalent Mac.
Apple have done a grand job, lets hope that the developers of the products listed above keep developing and take some of our comments onboard and someday we might have an expose equiv worthy of comparison to the real thing.
Game is fairly easy :)
I've tried them all now and the only ones worth considering are
WinPLOSION TopDesk Entbloess
WinPLOSION : needs more work. Try getting it to work with Aqua Dock ... it doesn't !! And it can't be placed on the exclude list either because of the space in the process name. Konfabulator needs to be placed on the exclude list to work. I found this to be the least polished of all the apps.
TopDesk & Entbloess are much better looking products, although I don't like the way Entbloess brings windows to the foreground - not smooth.
I guess none of them are perfect yet.
Expose can be opened in two ways: by briefly pressing the function key (e.g. f2) and at that point expose will stay open until a window is selected or the same function key is pressed again (same as in win versions but not in winPlosion!!). The second and best way to open the original Expose is by keeping the selected function key pressed. Expose will stay open until the same key is released. NICE & Smart! Strangely this second option was not picked up by the Win imitations.
As previously mentioned here, there are only 3 Win utilities worth mentioning: entbloess, winplosion and topdesk. For its simplicity my favorite is topdesk but anyone serious about using this tool, should install all three and pick the one that better suits his needs.
I wonder of theres an expose equiv for Linux?
I'm going to just try them all.
It's times like these I wish I didn't have an AMD processor! :)
Like I am going to just throw away my Windows machine to buy one of your overpriced yuppy machines just for one feature (expose).
You know if I bought a Mac I guess I would just have to go without any good games (since they all come out for Windows-- BTW Doom3 sucks).
You know there is a reason Macs are the minority of computers... because they are too full of themselves to really be a "computer for everyone"... that's because they only cater to YUPPIES who have the money to spend on their products.
If Apple really wanted to bring their Wonder-OS to the masses then they wouldn't make you buy one of their "purty" machines. I can build a FAST system way cheaper than buying their stuff.
You know I don't give a S__T about the aesthetics of the hardware if I can only run a minority of software on it AND have to pay more for it. And I'd rather support the market of third party hardware manfacturers anyway than give all my money to Apple so they can continue to overcharge me.
(BTW I use MacOSX as a graphic designer... it's only better because of the design of the OS... but MacOSX is still way slower than Windows... why do you need dual processors just to run a freakin' GUI at full speed).
I'm sure to rile up some Mac freaks here but you can't avoid the truth... I'll deal with the spyware because Windows is just more fun to use. Macs are best for boring work (only if you have the most expensive (fastest) model, I can still work FASTER on my Windows machine although the GUI is more intuitive on MacOS)... that's it.
And why can't I delete certain items out of the trash (or just immediately delete files with moving to trash) in MacOSX instead of having to empty the WHOLE trash. That's stupid.
You sound like a 14-year-old whining about how "Mine is better than yours" ... People have a choice, it's up to them whether to use OS X, Windows, Linux, or whatever else they want.
Sure, Windows may have more games, but games are certainly not the reason I buy a computer...
Windows may have more Applications, but just look at how badly most of them are written...
If you want features provided by OS X, then buy a Mac... If you don't, then stop ranting on like someone's just stolen your favourite toy.
I have a variety of systems (including OS X, Windows and FreeBSD) for the simple reason that I make use of features provided by each of them.
Use whatever works for you and stop complaining.
"TopDesk: great app in its F9/tile feature. Works well and swiftly with window captions but in the Trial version theres no F10/F11 equivalent or configuration options! Only in the registered version. Well, what use is that to me? I want to test the full app not some crippled version. Add to that, the fact that it was using 31MB of system ram and it loses the battle. The resitered version has lots more options apparently but with the other competition here, im not paying the $10 to find out."
I just tried F10,F11,F12 as well as F9 with the trial version 1.3.7 and everything works great. What version were you running as the trial?
Also, I agree with Matt.... Buy a Mac and all of these problems go away. ALso, This function was designed to work on a machine with the capability to handle the redering necessary to perform smoothly. An affordable "Wintel" Machine just cannot do it.
In fact, I just tested entbloess now and the "live updating" is purely a joke. I have a fast computer with Go6800 256MB graphic but I can clearly see that it just takes static snapshots in intervals, and it is not live and smooth at all.
So far the best tool from my point of view is Winplosion, it is the lest resources consuming tool and has the smallest memory footprint, only around 5-6MBs with around 20 windows opened.
entbloess seemed to be the most feature rich in terms of customizability. i liked how you could customize the backdrop and the fonts and all sorts of other sillyness. but it didn't work with my multiple monitors (i have a three-headed setup), so i had to keep looking. if you're running one monitor, i reccomend entbloess over most of the other ones, at least if your hardware is similar.
i then went to winplosion, which was decent but pretty basic featurewise. i almost bought it, but their weird, anal registration thing was having difficulties with my firewall. i personally get a bit peeved at anyone that's so bent about piracy that they make it difficult for me to purchase their product, so i moved on.
iEX had all kinds of old VB6 dependencies i didn't feel like installing, so you're on your own there.
winGlance was decent, but again, problems with the multiple monitors.
exposer was the only one out of the bunch i can say performed outright poorly on my system. there didn't seem to be any animation whatsoever really. and while it shows the titlebar zoomed up when you hover over the window, it doesn't recognize my window manager, so if you're using windowblinds, ignore this.
in the end i went with topdesk. i think they've probably changed their demo since last year, because i saw all the features that i got with the final version. it worked fine with multiple monitors, had enough speed options that i found a decent setting for my system, etc
it also had a few things i hadn't found in the ones above, namely it has vista's upcoming 3d task switch as a mode, and was one of the few that got the spatial relationship of the windows right, for "true" expose functionality.
my only complaint was that it didn't notice a few non-standard application windows (winamp, trillian's buddy list window, though it did see the individual chat windows).
i noticed that they're trying to work that out, probably for the 1.5.x cycle (1.4.x is largely cleanup)
another thing it doesn't do too hot is active updates for say, a video window. in that department, entbloess seemed to reign supreme. entbloess also seemed to be the biggest RAM-hog however, particularly with those aggressive settings, and i think it peaked at around 80mb of ram with five windows open. comparitively, topdesk took up around 20 to 40mb, depending on how conservative you set the options.
i'd reccomend entbloess if you have only one monitor, like the active previews feature, and have a lot of RAM you don't mind throwing at a task switcher.
i'd reccomend winPlosion if you're looking for a middle-of-the-road application and don't have too much trouble registering it.
i'd reccomend topdesk if having the effect maintain its spatial positioning properly is important, have multiple monitors, or you also want to be able to mimick the upcoming vista task switch functionality.
Apple's implementation just makes them smaller. I haven't had enough windows that they wouldn't fit at 1x1 pixel each, so I dunno what happens then.
At least I have OSX86 - that is, if the drivers work out...
But maybe Linux!... sucks ass.
If your obsessed with the idea behind expose (implemented so well by apple) then I recommend either getting a Mac (don't buy if you tend to be prejudiced) or Vista (may a divine power give you strength). Or if your extremely technical A) you want to be legal: get a fancy Linux-box with Beryl&XGL and whatnot.
B) you want to er... adventurous: get an OSX86 distro
If none of those options work, then try -~ .,TopDesk,. ~-. If it's too slow for you, forget about having an expose clone for XP. All the rest fail, and in any case you should stop sacrificing precious system performance or upgrade. Maybe the 'coolswitch' microsoft powertoy can help you out. Or maybe there's a miracle program out their that I haven't heard of.
I'm surprised this comment chain is still going. I've seen wars half this size cut off by site admins//.
PS - QWERTY was meant to slow down typists.. <http://www.geocities.com/malibu_malv/curse_qwerty.html> & "Macs are for yuppies, not the majority" I agree with you for the most part. Games on Mac truly do suck. And other things... I use all three brands of OS more or less equally. Sadly, most consumers don't know how to write line a of code. Most consumers take their opinion from (vomitretchhack) marketing or prejudice (such as from opinionated family members) or mixtures of other social influences. Your right, the monopoly is for the majority. The BMW with the broken stickshift is for the minority. Oh, and enjoy working on your 'boring work' graphic design.
BTW, all you expose-clone schills are frickin pathetic, get a life!
- CFSCRIPT Cheatsheet
- 3 New Image Effects for ColdFusion 8
- Googlebot to Submit Web Forms
- ColdFusion 8 Update 1 Fixes some Image Processing Quirks
- 10 Most Useful Image Functions in ColdFusion 8
- Speaking at NYC CFUG This Week
- Adobe AIR Tutorial for HTML / JavaScript Developers
- INFORMATION_SCHEMA Support in MySQL, PostgreSQL
RSS
add to del.icio.us
Pete Freitag is a software engineer, and web developer located in










